RAND Policy Currents

"U.S. retrenchment:  How allies have responded in the past."

Views expressed in this geopolitical news and analysis are those of the reporters and correspondents.

Accessed on 10 July 2025, 2345 UTC.

Content and Source:  "RAND Policy Currents."

URL--https://www.rand.org.

Please check URL or scroll down to read your selections.  Thanks for joining us today.

Russ Roberts (https://trendsingeopolitics.blogspot.com).

THE NEWSLETTER FOR POLICY PEOPLE

JULY 10, 2025

Photo by Suga/Wikimedia

How Allies Have Responded to Past U.S. Retrenchment

The Trump administration is considering U.S. retrenchment from Europe and possibly elsewhere. There are competing claims about the potential effects of reducing U.S. military involvement abroad.

To better understand the potential trade-offs, a new RAND report explores four cases of limited U.S. retrenchment in the 1960s and 1970s, examining how West Germany, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan responded to shifts in Washington's strategy.

These four allies tended to react to U.S. retrenchment by increasing their defense spending, working more closely with regional partners, moderating their foreign policy goals, and maintaining alignment with the United States. One ally, South Korea, initiated a nuclear program that Washington opposed. (Seoul eventually abandoned the program under intense U.S. pressure.)

What does this mean for today? If future U.S. policy shifts are similar to those of the past, then they could produce similar effects. More dramatic changes, on the other hand, could produce different outcomes.

It’s also worth noting that modern-day U.S. allies are more economically intertwined with China than allies were with America’s Cold War rivals several decades ago. This raises the possibility that retrenchment could have different effects on allies' alignment choices.

This analysis reveals a few recommendations for U.S. policymakers considering retrenchment:

  • Manage allies’ opposition to retrenchment while incorporating their input about implementation.
  • Don’t expect limited retrenchment to be a one-size-fits-all way to improve burden-sharing. (Effects can vary based on each ally’s characteristics.)
  • Weigh nonproliferation against burden-sharing goals.

Up in the Air: How Will Air Taxis Impact Communities?

Countering China in the Indo-Pacific

RAND Recommends

Events

Learn Policy Analysis from RAND Experts

."

V

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WPR Daily Review.

CFR Daily Brief

WPR Daily Review.