Yesterday, we asked whether lawmakers should move to create Trump tributes. Here’s what you had to say: “He has [his] name already on many of his businesses, which is where they belong and not on any federal property. If DOGE is working to save the U.S. money then here is a perfect example of how not to spend unnecessary U.S. taxpayer dollars.” —Michael Maiden, Kansas “I hope President Trump will have a tribute one day, but believe that it is too soon. If the question means a statue or building, that should wait until he is no longer with us. He has a mammoth task and is off to a good start, but let's wait to see how it ends up.” —Kitty Allen, North Carolina “Absolutely not. Fawning over a sitting president by creating a tribute such as a national holiday or renaming an airport sets a dangerous precedent. It could lead to the possibility of endless national holidays or a revolving door of name changes for airports, highways and buildings with each new administration. Tributes should be posthumous.” —Candace Johnson, Oregon Responses have been condensed and edited. |
Comments
Post a Comment
Welcome to my geopolitics blog site. This is a Hawaii Island news site focusing on geopolitical news, analysis, information, and commentary. I will cite a variety of sources, ranging from all sides of the political spectrum.